Brookfield signal reference Ver. 2.0

By John Moon; posted April 8, 2009

View Original: Click to zoom, then click to magnify (1746 x 847) 913KB

 


Okay, so I had some input on my last picture post and added a few more profiles tonight. This should help clarify a few things, or confuse you all to pieces depending on your view. I would like to add a square dome 162.1 to this comparision as it would probably provide a more distinct profile difference but I can't seem to find mine tonight.

Also I have received a couple comments on the 162.3. While I agree it is not the strongest, most typical profile for one of these, I have been assured it is a 162.3. More on this later as my collection expands and grows.

Thanks for all the positive comments. - John

243817528